"en arche en ho logos" "In
the beginning was the word." John
1:1a
The above sentence was penned by the apostle John
between 69CE and 100CE. I give that range because there are plausible reasons
for the dates given by scholars. This is not about the dating of the Gospel
According to John, This is about the origin and use of the Greek word logos as
it relates to creation., and orthodoxy has done a great disservice to the
concept. However, if you ever read anything I write that should not be
surprising because orthodoxy has done a great disservice to Christ and Jesus of
Nazareth.
I was taught in seminary, and in all approved
books for those with the evangelical focus, John’s gospel, and first century
Christianity in general was the source for the spiritual understanding of Logos
(the Word.) Absolutely nothing could be farther from the truth. With that
statement let’s begin to look at the history and development of the Greek word
logos.
First of all, one should not limit the concept to
just Greek thought. So, let’s look at the definition from Strong’s Greek
dictionary to get the Greek definition. “From G3004; something said (including the
thought); by implication a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the
mental faculty) or motive; by extension a computation; specifically (with the
article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ): - account, cause,
communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter,
mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say (-ing), shew, X
speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings,
treatise, utterance, word, work.” It can be seen
that the meaning and use is broad, but at the base focus of it all is
consciousness. Thayer defines it this way. 2) its use as
respect to the MIND alone
“2a) reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning,
calculating
2b) account, i.e. regard, consideration 2c) account, i.e.
reckoning, score 2d) account, i.e. answer or explanation in
reference to judgment 2e) relation, i.e. with whom as judge we stand in
relation 2e1)
reason would
2f) reason, cause, ground” This is Thayer’s
second definition but it is basic to the meaning and use of the term over the
millennia.
It is fair to say that the
definition of Logos is consciousness, conscious thought, and action initiated
by consciousness. Thus, the Logos of God is god consciousness. So was the
apostle John the originator of the doctrine of the Logos? Absolutely not. The doctrine
of the Logos was developed by a Jewish Philosopher named Philo of Alexandria. He
lived between 20 BCE and 40 CE. He was therefore a contemporary of Jesus, John,
and Paul. He had studied Greek Philosophy and discovered the Logos there and
set out in his writings to amalgamate the Greek Logos with the Hebrew concept
of God and the Hebrew scriptures. He originated the idea that Logos was the
creative aspect of God a mediator between God and humanity, and that it was the
son of God for his time. I say for his time as it was actually much more
ancient a concept, but he brought the idea to the first century Judeo-Christian
world. I realize that evangelical theologians will get their back up on this
claim, but without valid reason because the facts are inescapable. Philo wrote,
lived, and died before John wrote John 1:1, and his elaboration on the Logos is
extensive.
However, as I stated earlier the
concept is ancient. It goes all the way back to the Egyptians and the Babylonians.
Of course Logos is a Greek word so it goes back to the ancient Greek
philosophers, but the concept of God, the source, having a word that was the
creator, and his son goes all the way back to Thoth in Egypt. Here’s where it
gets a little tangled. Pythagoras the Greek Philosopher, metaphysicist, and
mathematician traveled to Egypt, studied their teachings and brought them back
to Greece. The teachings of Thoth got turned into the teachings of the Greek
God Hermes, and became known as Hermes Trismegistus, which means the thrice
great Hermes. It was recorded in the Corpus Hermeticus. However, with the
translation of the hieroglyphics it was discovered that the teaching was found
on the pyramids in Saqqara Egypt and date back to 3,000 BCE.
Here is an excerpt from the
Hermetica. “Who are you?' I asked. 'I am the Way-Guide, the Supreme Mind,
the thoughts of Atum the One-God. I am with you — always and everywhere. I know
your desires. Make your questions conscious, and they will be answered.' 'Show
me the nature of Reality. Bless me with Knowledge of Atum,' I begged. Suddenly
everything changed before me. Reality was opened out in a moment. I saw the
boundless view. All became dissolved in Light — united within one joyous Love.
Yet the Light cast a shadow, grim and terrible, which, passing downwards,
became like restless water, chaotically tossing forth spume like smoke. And I
heard an unspeakable lament — an inarticulate cry of separation. The Light then
uttered a Word, which calmed the chaotic waters. My Guide asked: 'Do you understand
the secrets of this vision? I am that Light — the Mind of God, which exists
before the chaotic dark waters of potentiality. My calming Word is the Son of
God — the idea of beautiful order; the harmony of all things with all things.
Primal Mind is parent of the Word, just as, in your own experience, your human
mind gives birth to speech. They cannot be divided, one from the other, for
life is the union of Mind and Word”. ~ Freke, Tim. The Hermetica: The Lost
Wisdom of the Pharaohs (pp. 32-34). Tim Freke Publications. Kindle Edition.
It is not surprising that all of
the ancient Greek Philosophers wrote about the Word, Logos being the divine
seed and the creative source of God. It was written about by Heraclitus, Plato,
the Stoics and from them was picked up by Philo of Alexandria.
However, it was also a concept
that was explored and explained in eastern thought as well. For example, here
is an excerpt from the Tao Te Ching (pronounced dao de ching.) “The Tao that
can be understood is not the eternal, cosmic Tao, just as an idea that can be
expressed in words is not the infinite
idea. And yet this ineffable Tao is the
source of all spirit and matter; expressing
itself, it is the mother of all created things.” ~Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching . Ancient Renewal.
Kindle Edition. You can see two things here. First, the Tao is the creative
source of all things, and second, when Lao Tzu writes expressing itself he is
speaking of the word which is equal to the Logos in Greek. The Online
Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that the idea of the Logos/word is also found
in Hindu and Buddhist religions.
I hope I am making it clear that
the concept of the Logos is indeed ancient, ubiquitous, and syncretistic. It
fits nicely within my view of eclectic spirituality. It for certain is not exclusive
and original within Christianity. It is far more broad in scope than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment