Introduction:
This will begin a series of posts that will offer an
alternative plausible explanation of the things that Steven Greenstreet has
been critical of in his “Basement Office” series on the New York Post’s YouTube
channel. The series in question has been presented over the last eleven months.
It began with the Bigelow years, James Lacatski, and Jay Stratton and moves
through the Fugal years with the docuseries “The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch” on
the History Channel.
It is my view that Greenstreet borders Yellow Journalism in
his six-part series. He mis-represents the facts by eliminating some and
emphasizing others to present his point of view. His YouTube videos are a hit piece
on the UFO/UAP phenomenon, Skinwalker Ranch and to a degree Mormonism.
According to him he was raised Mormon and even went on a mission as a young
man. While he obviously left that religion it appears that he may have an axe
to grind with it and has chosen to do so with Skinwalker Ranch.
It is my intent over several blog posts to take a deeper dive
into each one of his videos and point out what I see to be blatant and glaring
misrepresentations. It is not that he prevaricates, but rather just chooses to
select facts that bolster his narrative and eliminate many that do not. It is
his omissions that I will focus on in this series.
It appears that his narrative is informed by a physicalist
materialist view of science. This of course has been the standard since the
beginning of the Age of Reason, or the Enlightenment, but is rapidly losing
ground in the face of cognitive scientists like Dr. Donald Hoffman, cutting
edge physicists in the field of quantum mechanics like Sir Roger Penrose, Max
Tegmark and others and last but not least, philosophers like Bernardo Kastrup
who have some form of a panpsychist view of reality. Many are speaking out
against the dogma of science claiming that younger scientists are discouraged
from exploring other theories because it can lead to career suicide. The pendulum
is swinging back toward a far more platonic view of reality, and it is causing
consciousness to have a foundational place in the nature of reality.
When one looks at the phenomenon associated with Skinwalker
Ranch that goes back historically at least eighty years in modern times and has
a history that goes back at least a thousand years with the stories,
petroglyphs, and superstitions of the Native American people that surround the
property. There is a narrative there that cannot possibly be all fiction. Even
beginning with the documentation of Junior Hicks one finds a plethora of anecdotal
information that points to what is called a high strangeness for the Ranch and
the surrounding area. For a further background on my view, you can view my post
entitled It is all one thing.
Since I want to be brief as possible in each of the posts
without neglecting salient factual alternatives, I will cite one incident in
this post. I use this because this explanation got me blocked on Greenstreet’s
twitter account. It was either this or my pun on his mission but, either way it
is obvious that he does not deal well with cogent alternative theories to his.
The incident involves his next to the most recent video that was entitled Signs and Wonders. In that he interviewed the team in the ranch house that is occupied by Kandus Linde and Tom Lewis. The discussion is centered around what James Lacatski saw in the kitchen from the book “Skinwalkers at the Pentagon.” I will insert an image that I showed in response to Greenstreet on his twitter feed that subsequently got me blocked. The images will be at the bottom of this post.
Greenstreet insinuated that the current SWR team had changed
the story from the kitchen to the foyer and that is far from the truth.
Lacatski was definitely in the foyer when he saw the phenomenon in the kitchen
which would definitely place the source of the perception distortion in the
foyer. It also reinforces a panpsychist view as there were others with Lacatski
that did not see it. This is a ubiquitous occurrence over the multitude of
stories that involve the ranch.
As stated above, this is but one instance of many where Greenstreet either omitted information or erroneously presented a false narrative. I look forward to continuing this series. Stay Tuned!
The images below show that I was blocked by him on twitter and the above image shows what I posted on twitter that challenged his narrative.
No comments:
Post a Comment