Friday, March 19, 2021

God Beyond Religion: Developing healthy self-love

Mat 22:36-40 CSB  “Teacher, which command in the law is the greatest?”  (37)  He said to him, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.  (38)  This is the greatest and most important command.  (39)  The second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.  (40)  All the Law and the Prophets depend on these two commands.”

One of the focuses of evangelical theological dogma is best described as worm theology. It stems from the story of the fall and Paul's writings about the flesh and carnality. While it is true that humanity has a pathology of sorts due to the survival instinct, it is also true that most people are basically good. However, the focus on not trusting the flesh and the depravity of the human heart causes people to develop a form of self loathing. This results in not loving oneself at all. This makes it virtually impossible to love oneself and well, if a person suffering from self loathing loves their neighbor as they love themselves, the neighbor gets no love. 

The question becomes, is there such a thing as healthy self love? My answer is yes definitely. What then should be the source of self love? Here are five points to help develop self-love:
  1. We are created in the image of God, we are God's image bearers. Since God is a conscious loving spirit that means that we too are conscious loving spirits. Further, God is eternal, and that means that we too are eternal.
  2. We are loved by God and God has deemed us worthy of that love. If we are indeed loved by God and likewise deemed worthy of this love we can certainly realize that we should then love ourselves and deem ourselves worthy of this self-love. It is by virtue of God's love for us that we can indeed assume that God believes us worthy of love and therefore we are worthy of self love.
  3. We have an innate ability to love others. The fact is that we recognize in others the qualities that are deserving of love. While there are exceptions, most all people love someone, and the majority of people love many in many different ways.
  4. Before creation, God deemed us worthy of redemption and reconciliation. Paul states in Ephesians chapter one that God chose to love us, redeem us, reveal to us and in us "the Christ" before the foundation of the world which means before creation.
  5.  We are given an inborn sense of compassion for others. Very young children show love and compassion for puppies, kitties, and baby siblings. They also show love and affection for other siblings as well. Again, I am not suggesting that there are no exceptions but they are just that exceptions to a much larger rule.
Given the five examples above, it logically follows that this is sufficient reason to have a healthy self-love and respect. Why is this important you may wonder? It is very important in developing a healthy self attitude that will eliminate sabotaging ones self. It is an important part of being able to manifest goodness and high vibrations into ones life. This is especially true for a Christ follower that has been taught to hate their flesh. Hating their flesh really means hating themselves. It is called by some worm theology. And as stated above, worm theology is bad theology. If God loves us, it only makes sense that we should love ourselves.

Is there evil in the world? Are there some people that seem to have an evil inclination? Absolutely! However, the majority of people are essentially good and being able to have a healthy love and respect for themselves will increase their ability to love the other, not to mention making their world a better place. For any Christian that has been exposed to life long worm theology, if I am you neighbor, forget to follow the edict of loving your neighbor as you love yourself. I can do without that!

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

God Beyond Religion: Three Main Points for the Christ Follower to Focus on

No matter what religious tradition you come from this in my view is good advice. It is mainly intended for Christians, and I would say specifically deconstructing Christians, but it would be good for any if they are willing and able to receive it. What is a good focus for a deconstructing Jesus follower? Here I would like to describe three main points to answer the question.

  1. Believe that God is love as defined by the Apostle Paul in 1Co 13:4-8  "Love is patient, love is kind. Love does not envy, is not boastful, is not arrogant, (5)  is not rude, is not self-seeking, is not irritable, and does not keep a record of wrongs. (6) Love finds no joy in unrighteousness but rejoices in the truth.  (7)  It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.  (8)  Love never ends." The passage defines God.
  2. Stand firm for justice, especially for the poor and less fortunate. As much as one has the ability, minister to the needs of the poor bringing about fairness and justice in all things. Actively demonstrate a concern for others and the planet and all that inhabits it. This means that one should be concerned for the economic, social, governmental, and ecological health of Planet Earth.
  3. Learn to have a healthy love, respect, and concern for oneself, and then in turn apply and give this same love to others. Demonstrate the following attributes; Gal 5:22-23  "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,  (23)  gentleness, and self-control." This spiritual fruit should be the goal and standard for each and every person.
Take note:  IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE ABOVE THREE POINTS ARE NOT LOOKED AT AS A LAW THAT MUST BE KEPT TO PLEASE GOD OR ENDEAR ONE TO GOD.

It all begins as it should with the belief, which in my view is a subsequent fact, that GOD IS LOVE. Further, it has at its most basic understanding the belief, in my view is a subsequent fact, that God indeed, keeps no records of wrongs. This is the foundation that allows us to completely love and trust God. In fact, this is the only kind of God one could love, and a different kind of God could not truly be loved because of fear. 

It is at this juncture that Jesus of Nazareth plays an integral role. Not only did he teach that God is love, he demonstrated what God would be like were God human. That is but half of the mission of Jesus. The other half was to face death with the perfect faith that the loving Father God would raise him from the dead, thus overcoming death and proving once and for all, that all are eternal children of Papa God. This provides the catalyst for being able to achieve focus two and three.

If we realize that we are all children of the God who is love, we would naturally stand firm for justice for all, especially those who are downtrodden and less fortunate. It is belief in the fact that God does not keep records of wrong that is the catalyst for loving God. God's mercy, grace, forgiveness and love is what sets the human mind at ease and creates peace of mind. Peace of mind nurtures love. More than that, we would likewise be concerned and committed to respecting and protecting the planet and all that lives thereon. Ecology would be important to the one believing in a loving, merciful, totally forgiving creator.

Finally, developing a healthy love and respect for self will build upon the peace of mind from knowing that God is love. The realization that we are all eternal children of the creative source, makes it possible to be more selfless. This is the source of our love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self control. With a focus on a loving creator, these attributes will grow continually. This is the main reason that Paul received the mystical revelation that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself not counting sin. The only righteousness we have is imputed to us by God. Not for faith in Jesus but faith in God's original declaration that was recorded in Genesis 1:31. We are righteous because in creating humanity, God said it was very good.

This in my view is essential Christianity. All of the instructions of treating one another well found in the Sermon on the Mount are predicated on our faith in a loving creator, and our ability to love and respect ourselves.

Monday, March 15, 2021

God Beyond Religion: The Theological Theory of Everything

We know that physicists are searching to find a theory of everything that can take into account quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity. They want a theory that explains the quantum world and space time. I think that we have entered a new spiritual age where we need a theological theory of everything. We need a theology that is inclusive, and will honor all the mystical revelation of all religions across the centuries. It should be a theological theory that would make it possible for most religions  to accept each other, and admit that over the course of human history the Spirit of God has given mystical revelation to many different spiritual seers, and from many different religious traditions. It is important to realize that this mystical revelation was not given to just one tribe of people. It was given to benefit all tribes. 

The tribe that I was born into as a child, and participated in as an adult is the tribe of Christ followers. I hesitate to use the term Christian as I believe that it has a problematic connotation these days. However, the fact remains that I was raised Christian and now will quite likely die Christian. That does not mean that I embrace all of the dogma attached with Christianity. The fact is I do not. I was taught from childhood that one can have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I have just that. Jesus is real to me and is not just an imaginary friend. He continually speaks to me by his Spirit. We have actual conversations almost daily and for sure weekly. These happen within my mind but, I can clearly tell who is who, and there is no doubt that it is Jesus. I want to be specific. It is Jesus of Nazareth, the one written about in the New Testament. It is the one who spoke the words of the Sermon on the Mount, and it is the one who revealed himself to the Apostle Paul. It is Jesus who's Spirit is the Spirit of Christ that indwells humanity.

I want to also make it very clear that Jesus is not as exclusive as Orthodox Christian Dogma would lead one to believe. In fact he is ALL inclusive and that is the mystical message that he revealed to Paul. However, one has to discern the difference between Paul the mystic and Paul the rabbi to really understand how Jesus used Paul to teach an all-inclusive doctrine. Spiral dynamics is a current theory that explains the development of humanity on an upward spiral showing progression toward more and more enlightenment. It is imperative to realize that the bible has progressive revelation. It is also important to realize that the early church shut off progressive revelation by codifying the canon in the late fourth century. This resulted in a stagnation of progressive revelation within Christianity.

It is my belief that each of us chose our path in this life prior to arriving outside the womb. That means that we chose our location, time of birth, parents, and all of our social and natural circumstantial environment . The choice is made with a specific purpose in mind. It can be that a lesson to learn or an accomplishment to fulfill or quite likely both. This means that we choose what religious tradition if any we will be a part of. We choose the cultural level of enlightenment we will experience. This is based on our past and especially our past lives. Yes, I believe that reincarnation is a fact of this universe, and of our purpose here.

This can be observed in the material world around us. Everything is cyclical. The water cycle is a great example. Rain is followed by evaporation and ultimately results in rain again. Leaves grow, fall, return to the soil and new leaves replace them. The cycles are many. If one believes as I do that the material universe is created by conscious energy, then it logically follows that this conscious energy would be cyclical as well. Paul hints at it in Galatians. In chapter six, he says, Gal 6:7  "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow." It is reasonable to conclude that he is speaking of God's restorative justice. 

As I stated earlier, we choose our life path every time. It does not have to be a recycle of life here. Jesus said that in his Father's house were many rooms, dwelling places. It could be that we chose other dimensions within heavenly places. The possibilities are limitless.

Since I chose to be born into evangelical Christianity, and have since been spiritually led to an inclusive and universal expression of Christianity, then my beginning focus must be Christianity, and if Christianity, it must be with a significant connection with Jesus of Nazareth. While some may believe that they need to separate themselves from Jesus, I on the other hand see Jesus as an integral part of my spirituality. Therefore it is incumbent on me to articulate what I see as Jesus teaching and the role that he plays in my spirituality. 

What do I see as Jesus essential teachings? First and foremost he introduced God as a loving father. He went on to teach that love was the most important attribute that a human can have. According to John, Jesus taught them that God is/was love. It was such an important concept that John stated it twice in his short first epistle, (1John 4:8&16.) This then is my premise. The teaching of Jesus begins with God is love. In the Greek original text it would read that God is agape'. Agape' is the highest form of love, it is selfless love and it is the love that Jesus taught. 

The second essential teaching is found in Paul's definition of love and spiritual fruit. Love is defined in 1Co 13:4-8 CSB  "Love is patient, love is kind. Love does not envy, is not boastful, is not arrogant,  (5)  is not rude, is not self-seeking, is not irritable, and does not keep a record of wrongs.  (6)  Love finds no joy in unrighteousness but rejoices in the truth.  (7)  It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.  (8)  Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come to an end." So then, when Jesus says that all will know that one is his disciple by the love they have for one another, it provides a specific detailed explanation of what Jesus meant. Paul went on to define the fruit or action that would stem from the Spirit of God. It was love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness.

If John was right, and if God is love, then it follows that the definition of love is the definition of God. Further, if the above is the definition of God is true then Yahweh is not a good representation of God. Much of the genocide found in the Old Testament does not fit with the idea that God is love, and it definitely does not model the idea that God keeps no record of wrongs. This requires spiritual discernment about what is divine revelation and what is cultural. I will explain this a little farther on in this post.

You may say to me. You have mentioned Christianity, the Christian view of God so how is this the Theological Theory of Everything? That is a fair and important question. I wrote earlier that one should leave the dance with the one that brought them. This is a metaphor for the idea that we all chose our life-path and in so doing set the conditions for our sojourn here on planet earth. Since I readily admit that I was born a Christian and chose that as my life path then it is incumbent on me to see the universal aspect of my faith in Jesus. In that I should not be exclusive of all other religious traditions. In fact, I can gain much by embracing some of their tenets and beliefs.

How should I choose which ones? Another great question. The standard, the measure should be found in Paul's definition of love in 1 Corinthians thirteen, and the fruit of the spirit found in Galatians five. Anything that fits with all of those defining characteristics is from the creative source of the universe. All that are not should be relegated to cultural human input. To give an example, that is not all inclusive but rather a sample of what I mean, I will quote the Tao Te Ching, by Lao Tzu. This shows that the Tao is similar to the Logos. 

"The Tao that can be understood is not the eternal, cosmic Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words is not the infinite idea.  And yet this ineffable Tao is the source of all spirit and matter; expressing itself, it is the mother of all created things.  Not to desire material things is to know the freedom of spirituality; and to desire them is to suffer the limitations of matter.  Yet these two things, matter and spirit, so different in nature, have the same origin.  This unity is the mystery of mysteries, and the gateway to spirituality." ~Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching . Ancient Renewal. Kindle Edition. 




Friday, February 26, 2021

God Beyond Religion: Redemption from the Tao Te Ching

Redemption - At that time, the broken will be made perfect; the bent will be made straight; the empty will be filled; the worn-out will be renewed; those having little will obtain much; and those having much will be overcome.  The wise, embracing unity, will become the world’s model. Not striving, they will become enlightened; not asserting themselves, they will become distinguished; not boasting, they will be praised; not building up themselves, they will endure.  As much as they embrace the world, the world will embrace them.  Is the old saying, “The broken shall be restored,”  a false hope? No! All will be restored and return rejoicing.

~Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching . Ancient Renewal. Kindle Edition. 

The above quote is from the Tao Te Ching, which is pronounced the Dao De Jing credited to Lao Tzu in roughly 500 BCE. The fact is that the above passage could have been said by Jesus or it could have been written by the Hebrew Prophet Isaiah. This is a continuing theme in God Beyond Religion. It shows the universality of mystical revelation over the centuries. For me, it actually makes it easier to believe that God is love, that the fruit of the spirit is correct, and that the definition of love fits in nicely and naturally with mystical revelation. 

Look at what Lao Tzu wrote about peace: "Peace is meant to be our natural state. A whirlwind never outlasts the morning, nor a violent rain the day. Just as earth and sky return to peace, so should we. They who act with violence become violent. They who act with virtue become virtuous. They who act in the spirit of the Tao become Tao-like. They who follow the Tao, the Tao will guide. They who pursue virtue, virtue will reward. They who live by violence, violence will soon destroy."

~Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching . Ancient Renewal. Kindle Edition. 

Jesus said that blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. He also said that those who live by the sword will die by the sword. It is important to realize that one of the fruits of the spirit is peace. The great thing about it is that I do not have to give up my faith in, nor my relationship with Jesus to acknowledge divine revelation given to others who are not Christian. 

Again, I need to repeat over and over this fact. According to the New Testament, God is love. According to the New Testament here is a definition of Love. 1Co 13:4-8  "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  (5)  It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  (6)  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  (7)  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.  (8)  Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away." It logically follows that if God is love, then the above passage is also definitive of God.

The New Testament also explains and defines the fruit of the Spirit. Gal 5:22-23  "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,  (23)  gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law." This passage describes and defines the fruit of God's Spirit. Love is the definition of God, and the fruit is what the Spirit of God produces.

Therefore, and I want to emphasize and underscore this point! When discerning what is inspired by God, one has to see the attributes that describes God or the fruit of the Spirit of God or it is NOT inspired by God. Let me repeat. ANYTHING, that does not line up the definition of love, or the fruit of the Spirit of God IS NOT INSPIRED BY GOD!!!!



Tuesday, February 23, 2021

God Beyond Religion: The Role of Mysticism, Participants of the Divine Nature

2Pe 1:3-4  "His divine power has given us everything needed for life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.  (4)  Thus he has given us, through these things, his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may escape from the corruption that is in the world because of lust, and may become participants of the divine nature."

I am in the process of re-reading a book that I read in the 1970's. It was written by Abraham Maslow and entitled Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences. I had lost or misplaced the book but found a free PDF of it online. You can access it yourself here. I need to thank the Bahai People for making it available. Maslow has an interesting premise about religions vs. mystical experience. Here is an excerpt from chapter three. 

“If you will permit me to use this developing but not yet validated vocabulary, I may then say simply that the relationship between the prophet and the ecclesiastic, between the lonely mystic and the (perfectly extreme) religiousorganization man may often be a relationship between peaker and non-peaker. Much theology, much verbal religion through history and throughout the world, can be considered to be the more or less vain efforts to put into communicable words and formulae, and into symbolic rituals and ceremonies, the original mystical experience of the original prophets. In a word, organized religion can be thought of as an effort to communicate peak-experiences to non-peakers, to teach them, to apply them, etc. Often, to make it more difficult, this job falls into the hands of non-peakers. On the whole we now would expect that this would be a vain effort, at least so far as much of mankind is concerned. The peakexperiences and their experiential reality ordinarily are not transmittable to nonpeakers, at least not by words alone, and certainly not by nonpeakers. What happens to many people, especially the ignorant, the uneducated, the naive, is that they simply concretize all of the symbols, all of the words, all of the statues, all of the ceremonies, and by a process of functional autonomy make them, rather than the original revelation, into the sacred things and sacred activities. That is to say, this is simply a form of the idolatry (or fetishism) which has been the curse of every large religion. In idolatry the essential original meaning gets so lost in concretizations that these finally become hostile to the original mystical experiences, to mystics, and to prophets in general, that is, to the very people that we might call from our present point of view the truly religious people. Most religions have wound up denying and being antagonistic to the very ground upon which they were originally based.Quoted from chapter 3, Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences, Abraham Maslow, Author.

The difference between the peaker and non-peaker according to Maslow is that the non-peaker has but a vicarious experience with the religion that was developed to explain the peak experience of a peaker. Likewise, according to Maslow it is always a vain attempt as the non-peaker does not have the experience, and therefore the understanding of the mystic. Further, most times the peaker's experience is explained by to others by non-peakers in a form that results on dogma. Whereas the peaker has mystical experiences whereby there is communication between the peaker, and the supernatural creative source.

The mystical experiences can be in the form of visions, audible messages, sensing, and knowing. When visions, the person is known as a clairvoyant, audible messages a clairaudient, sensing a clairsentient, and knowing a claircognizant. These are attributes readily accepted in the metaphysical community. However, they are true of Christ followers as well. Paul eluded to them by mentioning the word of wisdom and the word of knowledge. The Hebrew Prophet Joel recorded this more than seven hundred years before Jesus. Joel 2:28  "Then afterward I will pour out my spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions." According to the apostle Peter, this happened on the day of Pentecost. Peter no where recorded that it would end. In fact, the passage cited at the beginning of this post explains that we are participators in the divine nature. Even if you are skeptical about the 2 Epistle of Peter being authentically by him, it was undoubtedly written by a student or follower of him, and that person no doubt heard Peter say it and teach it. 

If you take the time to read the Tao Te Ching, you will undoubtedly come away with the opinion that it was divinely inspired. Much of all the writings and teachings of the mystics came from inspiration from the creative source of the universe. Dare I say? All great writing comes from inspiration from the divine nature. This brings me to the verse from 2 Peter. It is possible today for all to be participants in the divine nature. In fact, at the unconscious spiritual level all are. We participate in creating our world and our circumstance. The purpose of this post is to make us aware of it and thereby cause us to be more intentional about our participation. I think the operative word is to become mindful.

One of the downsides of strict dogmatic beliefs is that they discourage mystical experiences. They do this by frowning on mystical revelation that appears to contradict what was written before either in sacred texts or orthodox interpretation of the sacred texts. The reality is however, that there is a continual growth in consciousness in an upward spiral. What may seem correct for one culture is not of necessity incumbent on successive cultures.

Further, if God is love, and if the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, kindness, gentleness and self control, then it follows that mystical revelation will incorporate those ideas. In fact, one can comfortably discern a mystical message by whether or not it incorporates those ideals. It is also imperative to use the standard of the definition of love in the discernment. 1Co 13:4-8  "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  (5)  It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  (6)  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  (7)  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.  (8)  Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away." The latter part of verse eight suggests that prophecies from previous cultures will in fact pass away.

So what exactly am I saying here? We will move toward the upward spiral of consciousness as we begin to realize that we are partakers of the divine nature and have an important role in advancing our spiritual consciousness.






Tuesday, February 16, 2021

God Beyond Religion: Mystical revelation across the centuries

This is not written to the ashiest nor even the agnostic. This is aimed at the religious person who has developed and adopted a belief system of faith in a specific religion, who believes in a creator God. It is only reasonable to agree that there is but one creator God. If there is a God and I am addressing those who believe there is, then it is also reasonable to believe that such a God is the one and only creative force of the universe. It seems equally reasonable to me that the one creative source of the universe is a monotheistic entity. It may make sense here to ask the question what is personhood? Personhood is the quality of an individual entity that has the ability to think, reason, act and communicate. It is within this definition that the creative source of the universe indeed has personhood. 

Therefore, if there is a creative source for the universe it is necessary that it is indeed conscious, reasonable, and able to act. Aldous Huxley in his book "The Doors of Perception" referred to the Mind at Large. In his view, the Mind at Large is available to all, but our brains actually act as a reducing valve to limit the amount of stimuli and information we take in. Could this Mind at Large be the consciousness of the creative source or God consciousness? Huxley encountered the Mind at Large while on mescaline but acknowledged that mystics and psychics experience it as a natural occurrence. Is it God consciousness that all of the mystics have tapped into? Did Lao Tzu tap into the Mind at Large--- God consciousness when he wrote the Tao Te Ching? Did Heraclitus and the Stoics after him tap into the Mind at Large--- God consciousness when they wrote about the Logos? I most definitely believe they did.

Let me include some incontrovertible facts predicated with an if__

If there is a creator God who created the universe it follows that there is but one creator God.

If the creator God is love, and the definition of love is this 1Co 13:4-8 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. (5)  It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  (6)  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. (7)  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.  (8)  Love never fails. It follows that this is the definition of God.

If the Stoics identified the creator God as the Logos, and it was substantiated by the John’s gospel, then the Logos is one name for the creator God. If Lao Tzu identified the Tao as the creator God it is yet another name for the one God. If quantum mechanics has identified the unified field as the creative source of the universe, then it is also a name for the one creator God.

If Jesus, and subsequently us are/were the incarnation of the Logos, first it would not be the totality of the Logos, and secondly, it would also be the incarnation of the Tao and the Unified Field.

I think that it is time that we begin to look at all of the mystical revelation throughout the centuries, and synthesize the message the spirit has been sending to humans over the years. So much of the past has resulted in tribal exclusionary beliefs. Yet, the human race is indeed one race and there is a sibling relationship amongst all humanity. There is a way that adopts tolerance that would allow individuals to maintain the unique positive aspects of their belief systems, and still be accepting of the beliefs of others. 

I was born into a family that held fundamentalist, evangelical, Christian beliefs. That in no way prevents me from seeing the universal nature of other mystical revelation and incorporating it into my belief system. I was only able to adopt this view as I began to see that it was reasonable to look at the sacred texts in a different way. I began to see that some of it was mystical revelation from the creator and some of it was cultural based on exclusive religious practice. Even in the writings of the apostle Paul, one needs to be able to discern between Paul the mystic, and Paul the second temple Jewish Rabbi.

This brings us to the point of this. It is important to look at an inclusive universal spirituality as opposed to an exclusive tribal spirituality. The sooner we embrace this the better off we will be. The error of exclusive theology and apocalyptic theories are being addressed within Christianity. Below is a telling table that explains the demographics of world religions today. You see a total of all the population accounted for including those who are secular, nonreligious, agnostic, and atheist. There are a total of roughly 7.8 billion people here on earth. Less than a third are Christian, and there are only 500 million evangelical Christians world wide. That is only about 5% of the world population. Isn't it interesting that this 5% of the religious world are certain that they alone are the only correct religion and the only ones that will go to heaven. This leaves 95% of the world in their view doomed to eternal torturous punishment for not believing the correct set of facts. Think about that for a minute and let it sink in.  

World Religion Demographics 2020 List of religious populations - Wikipedia

Religion

Adherents

Percentage

Christianity

2.382 billion

31.11%[3][2]

Islam

1.907 billion

24.9%[2][3]

Secular[a]/Nonreligious[b]/Agnostic/Atheist

1.193 billion

15.58%

Hinduism

1.161 billion

15.16%[2][3]

Buddhism

506 million

5.06%[2][3]

Chinese traditional religion[c]

394 million

5%

Ethnic religions excluding some in separate categories

300 million

3%

African traditional religions

100 million[6]

1.20%

Sikhism

26 million

0.30%

Spiritism

15 million

0.19%

Judaism

14.7 million[7]

0.18%

Baháʼí

5.0 million[8]

0.07%

Jainism

4.2 million

0.05%

Shinto

4.0 million

0.05%

Cao Dai

4.0 million

0.05%

Zoroastrianism

2.6 million

0.03%

Tenrikyo

2.0 million

0.02%

Animism

1.9 million

0.02%

Neo-Paganism

1.0 million

0.01%

Unitarian Universalism

0.8 million

0.01%

Rastafari

0.6 million

0.01%

total

7.79 billion

100%

Don't misunderstand me. Not all of the religions listed in the table are of equal value in mystical revelation about the true nature of God. However, they all contribute to the understanding. One glaring omission for me is Taoism. It is not missing but included in 394 million Chinese traditional religions. I mention Taoism because the Tao Te Ching is one of my favorite writings available to humanity. There is a close correlation between the Tao and the Logos in my view. 


I make no claim that I understand all of the religions mentioned. I am somewhat familiar with many. Second temple Judaism, which coincided with the time of Jesus of Nazareth was greatly influenced with Zoroastrianism and Greek Philosophy. The Logos was first written about by Heraclitus and the Stoics 500 years preceding Christ.


All of these can wrap into the suggested spirituality of quantum mechanics. The unified field likely describes the creative source, which is also been called the Logos and the Tao. An understanding of many of the traditions and the mystics that are associated with them can add a richness to the spiritual experience. This is from one who considers himself spiritual but not religious. I would even go so far as to say mystical but not religious. I am a peaker as defined by Abraham Maslow in his "Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences." 


1

 



Thursday, January 14, 2021

Your Lifepath is a Choice: Leaving the Dance with the One You Came With

I believe that our life path is a choice. It is one we made in committee before coming here. I also believe that there is a purpose to each of our lives and that the purpose was also a choice. To be clear, we chose our time of birth, our place of birth, the name we would be given, the family we would be a part of, the belief system we would be exposed to and influenced by, and it was all for a predetermined purpose that had attached a predetermined lesson, and a predetermined goal of achievement. So, I can be categorized as one who believes there are no accidents. 

Therefore, I chose to be born into a family in rural Michigan in the late 1940's. I chose to have a mother that was fundamentalist Baptist and a Father that went along with her belief but rarely attended church services. I on the other hand was in church every time the doors were opened, and in my childhood, that was indeed many times per week. I had a deep belief in the fact that Jesus was real from a small child forward. I was taught all of the doctrines of evangelical fundamentalism from a small child as well. However, from my recollection forward, I had a pastor that believed that once a person was saved they were always saved. The main point I want to make here is that I believed that Jesus was real.

However, as I grew to teenage and early adulthood, I became skeptical of much of what I had been taught as a young person. As I became educated, I found that many of the things I had been taught in that religious upbringing did not square well with scientific fact. Further, it was difficult to believe that all of the people who did not believe as I was taught was going to end up in eternal torturous punishment simply for not believing correctly.  I began to see the world I was emerging into was much larger than the one I had been raised in, I saw that there were really good and kind people who did not have a fundamentalist Baptist foundation. I was taught, that Roman Catholics especially, were destined for hell because they were not born again. This became more and more difficult to believe. Still my world was small relatively speaking. I was basically unaware that there were other religions other than Christians.

In relatively short time, I left all of my fundamentalist beliefs and completely rejected Christianity and actually threw the baby out with the bath water. As I branched out in college I began an awareness of a much broader world. People were beginning to think about and discuss the nature of the world in terms of quantum mechanics. I was introduced to Fritjof Capra's "The Tao of Physics." I read the novel's of Carlos Castaneda like Journey to Ixtlan, Tales of Power, and the Teaching of Don Juan.  I began to meet many people who were metaphysically inclined. I met clairvoyants and people who did automatic writing. I began to see fairly concrete evidence of a spiritual reality that superseded the material world. I was led toward mysticism without really knowing what that was. All the while I rejected Jesus out of hand. I was spiritual but not religious before that was even a thing.

I became interested in Numerology and while living in Phoenix Arizona, I did numerology readings for people. I attended meditation groups that did visual walks. I became deeply involved with the mystical, spiritual, metaphysical world. I should add that throughout my life, from childhood, I was very intuitive. It was almost like I could read people and their moods. This is still the case today. I am very spiritually in tune and really am quite accurate in reading people

It was in the mid 1990's that I had another spiritual shift. As I explained earlier, I had rejected Christianity and in so doing I had rejected Jesus. While I had rejected Christianity and Jesus, I had not rejected the idea that there was a conscious creator that had created the material world with a purpose in mind. I saw this creative source as the collective consciousness and had a mystical revelation that it was a combination of energy and thought. Early in the 1970's I wrote the "Primal Dream." The link provided allows you to read it if you have an interest. But now, in the mid 1990's I was having a spiritual shift again. This time it was the result of stressful life circumstances. It seemed like nothing was going right, and that my world was unraveling. This brought me to the point of soul searching and I remember going out on my back porch in Hayward California and looking up to the sky and praying. I have described what took place in this post called "The Back Porch Prayer." In short, the answer to the prayer resulted in me renewing my relationship with Jesus.

When I first came back to Jesus, there was a ton of baggage from my fundamentalist childhood days. I studied and studied and persevered past all of the condemnation of old voices playing old familiar themes in my head. But, as I studied, I was given a new set of glasses, a new lens for the scripture. This evolved slowly over a twenty-plus year period. I became increasingly more sure that what we call orthodoxy, and especially evangelical orthodoxy is completely off the rails. I saw that Jesus himself and his immediate first century followers had provided the new lens. The most important aspect of this shift was that I began to have continual conversations with Jesus and I knew that he was always with me, and in fact, had never left me. These conversations were of a spiritual nature, and no I did not audibly hear his voice but I did hear it distinctly in my mind. Later on, much of the communication came with a form of automatic writing or should I say automatic typing? It was an ongoing journal that allows me to sit down and allow the spirit to give me free flowing messages. I never have a clue as to what will be shared until I sit down that the keyboard and begin.

These sessions are always accompanied by me listening to binaural beats in a meditative state of mind. He continually reminds me of his love for me and for everyone. He shares that he is not only speaking on his behalf, but on Papa's behalf as well. These messages are always positive, and there is always a supernatural sense of peace that accompanies them. One of his favorite lines for me is "do not fret" based on my recollection of Psalm 37. It is his way of assuring me that he is watching over me and intervening on my behalf. Not with individuals, but with organizations. He does not choose between individuals as he loves each member of humanity equally. Of course, he and Papa do allow natural consequences to happen for all, but for the faith filled, born in this circumstance, they intervene in ways that brings victory and success out of defeat and failure.

Interesting story you may say, but what is your point? This is a great question to pose at this time. The point is that in order to have a successful sojourn here on this earth. One must work out and work through the circumstances of his or her life path, and discover the greater lesson and purpose. I believe that it is tied to the beginning, and the purpose to which we chose to be born. Our life here on this planet is as much for our spiritual and mystical growth as it is for our physical and intellectual growth. The Jesus story has played an important part in that for me. I am convinced that Jesus is/was indeed real. he was/is the unique first born of humanity from before creation. He came to demonstrate that we are all eternal by being willing to die to then be raised from the dead, and thereby overcome death in victory. He did not mean to create a religion. That was not his purpose at all.

Furthermore, he came to a people and a culture that believed in one God, but in a God that had the traits of a human. Their one God was capable of wrath and violence. Their one God chose some people over others to be the apple of his eye. Their one God demanded the complete annihilation of a people including women and children. Jesus came to a people that had a strong patriarchal order that could fairly be characterized as mysogonystic. Cultural context is everything. Cultural context is the way in which one can best understand the bigger picture and see the overall purpose. Therefore, the Jesus story is best understood by looking at a transition that took place within it. While Jesus came to first century Jews as their Messiah, the story does not end there. 

It begins with several key mystical revelations about and from, John the Baptist, the last Old Covenant Jewish prophet. He in fact declared this with the statement that he was simply the voice of one crying in the wilderness; a reference to Isaiah chapter forty. In that statement, he self identified as the one who would announce comfort to the people of Israel. This is indeed a mystical revelation and it was not just given to John, but to his mother Elizabeth and his father Zechariah. Entwined in this is Jesus himself. There is mystical revelation given around him as well. First to Mary his mother, and Joseph his father. It is important to emphasize that it is within the context of second temple Judaism, and fulfillment of the Jewish Old Covenant. It is transitional. It is a partial revelation of the Jesus story, and to understand it all, one has to look at the mystical revelation received by others all the way through the end of the first century. 

The most important part of this transition during Jesus ministry is what he revealed about the heart of God. He introduced God as Papa in the sky; a papa that loved his children. I realize that the concept is patriarchal and male centric, but we must remember the cultural context. It is in the framework of the culture, and it would not have been possible for those in the first century to understand it outside of that. In the same way that Jesus could not speak of airplanes or automobiles and be understood, it would likewise be impossible to speak in gender inclusive or genderless terms and be understood or received. But, that does not mean that the cultural understanding of the first century must be locked from that time henceforth. Nor, does the cultural bias of the time diminish the real message of Jesus. His message was that we were here on planet earth to love one another; to lay down our lives for others. He showed the first century Jews a very different God. He showed them a God that judged no one, but gave all judgment to the Son, and following that God, he said to Papa at his own murder, "forgive them they do not understand what they are doing."

However, that was not the end of the Jesus story. After his death and resurrection, he reached out to the Apostle Paul mystically. In understanding Paul's contribution to the Jesus story, it is imperative that one understands that Paul was a walking dichotomy. That was what he inherited from his cultural experience. He was Paul the trained Jewish Rabbi, and he was Paul the mystic that had been spiritually in tune with the Spirit of Jesus. It was never meant for the writings of Paul the rabbi to be frozen in time and practiced forward for all time. However, the revelation given to Paul the mystic is timeless. He revealed that God was in Christ Jesus reconciling the world to himself, and was not counting sin against humanity. He revealed that God chose this plan from before creation so that it would be God's favor that would be praised. It was Paul that revealed the importance of the resurrection. He showed that it was what overcame the fear of death and was the catalyst for peace with Papa. He revealed that is was Jesus faith and not our faith that justified humanity. Jesus was able to do it as a first born prototype of a new creation or a new humanity. These revelations are many more than I have expressed here but it makes the point. This needs to be spiritually discerned as uniquely different from the musings and judgments of Paul the trained rabbi. While they may have been just what was needed for the time, they were definitely not meant to be enshrined as a rule perpetually. 

Another important mystic that helped complete the Jesus story was the apostle John, the beloved. He gave two of the most important mystical revelations. First, he connected the incarnation of Jesus with the Logos that was first revealed to Heraclitus and the Stoics after him. This same concept of the creative source being the Logos, or in other words the consciousness of God, was also revealed and elaborated to Philo, a Jew who was never really a follower of Jesus. This revelation fits nicely with what Lao Tzu had concluded in the "Tao." It also is symbiotic with much of the facts surrounding quantum mechanics and that understanding of material reality and creation. The second important mystical revelation that John received was the fact that God is agape love, that is love is the nature of God. With this revelation I would be remiss not to mention the Apostle Paul again. He received the revelation that defined love, and therefore defined God. One important characteristic of love is that it keeps no record of wrongs. This is an important thing to understand when reaching peace with God. Akin to this definition of love, he gave the revelation of the characteristics that would be the fruit of the Spirit. It too was love, joy, peace just to name a few. The full definitions can be found in the thirteenth chapter of Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, and in the fifth chapter of Paul's letter to the Galatians.

It is totally unnecessary to incorporate all of the cultural norms of the first century when understanding these revealed truths of the Jesus story. It is likewise unnecessary to accept all of the conclusions of orthodoxy to have a meaningful relationship with Jesus. In fact, I am convinced that what we call orthodoxy, and especially evangelical orthodoxy, is in fact the strong delusion written about by Paul in his letter to the Thessalonians. The truth is that the new humanity is a reality whether believed or not. The truth is that we are currently living in the New Heaven and Earth and most are totally unaware of it. One does not have to be Christian to participate in the new heaven and earth, but an understanding of the Jesus story would be helpful in the same way that Taoism is helpful in my journey as a Jesus follower. My whole point here is that I was not born a Taoist and therefore my life path is not in the Tao, yet an understanding of the Tao Te Ching is very beneficial in my development in the Jesus story.

We, the human race, have just begun a journey into a far more inclusive consciousness. While the exclusive consciousness is desperately trying to hang on, it is a matter of time until it is no more. Thus, the title of this post. I am leaving the dance with the one that I came with.



Peace Is Proof: Why Fear Is Not the Voice of God

There is a simple test that has steadied me over the years whenever questions begin to surface, whenever inherited theological structures st...